Island in the shape of a star. Secrets of civilization, “star fortresses”: who, why, and how they built them. Pillau fortress, Kaliningrad region, Russia

Many are destroyed beyond recognition, some can hardly be considered stars at all, but the artifacts clearly speak for themselves, especially when assembled into the overall picture.

Why does history not pay attention to the same fortresses all over the Earth? They would have blamed everything on the “Roman Empire” if they had extended it to Japan or the Hawaiian Islands...

Take a closer look, maybe you also live next to one of these mysteries?

many are VERY difficult to recognize

UPD from comments:

I live in the center of such a multi-beam fortress - in the former Koenigsberg.

There, in a network of underground passages left, according to legend, by the pagans, black magicians, witchers and necromancers worked their mysterious deeds. There, in the center of the island of Kneiphof, according to legend, there was a miraculous passage to another world, where occultists ended up of their own free will, and a lost passerby could get there by accident."

The city was completely destroyed by American aircraft, but its power is successfully used to this day by mystics and occultists of all stripes and levels.

“During the Eastern Economic Forum, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Government Igor Shuvalov said that the Russian government is discussing the possibility of creating offshore zones in the Kaliningrad region... the implementation of this project will begin no earlier than 2019. After this, in his opinion, the region will become an international financial center. In this case, the territory of the offshore zone may become Oktyabrsky Island."

Oktyabrsky Island is closely adjacent to Kneiphof Island - the mystical center of money - big money...

Reality is multidimensional, opinions about it are multifaceted. Only one or a few faces are shown here. You should not take them as the ultimate truth, because, and at each level of consciousness and. We learn to separate what is ours from what is not ours, or to obtain information autonomously)

THEMATIC SECTIONS:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |

Star-shaped cities.

Throughout the planet, many fortified cities of the so-called star configuration have been preserved. There are hundreds of them. They are found in abundance in Europe, Asia, Africa, North and South America. All of them were built at different times, but most of them were built in the Middle Ages. All the beauty of these unusual structures can only be truly appreciated from a bird's eye view.

And although many of them are empty or have long been turned into ruins, you just need to rise a little above the ground and you will see something incredible... Everyone is surprised by the Nazca Lines, but these fortified cities of absolutely regular shape are no less amazing. This is how they planned and built it all? You’re just amazed when looking at their pictures, how symmetrical and unmistakably everything is done! But the result can only be assessed from a great height.

One of the most famous star fortresses is the fortified city of Palmanova, one of the outposts of the Venetian Republic. The city was founded in 1593, its construction was organized by the government of Venice.

As you can see, the outlines of the city from the old image completely coincide with the modern one, made using aerial photography.

Naarden, Netherlands:

One of the interesting places in the Netherlands that clearly stands out on Google satellite images is the Naarden Fortress. The fortified city of Naarden is interesting and notable for two things - firstly, its amazingly beautiful symmetrical shape, and secondly, the excellent condition of the fortifications. In plan, the fortress is an intricate figure, reminiscent of a six-pointed star with arrow-shaped shapes at the edges.

The 17th century Naarden fortress is located on a man-made island and has 6 symmetrical bastions.

This complex engineering structure has an extensive system of underground tunnels. The photo shows the upper segments of the ventilation system

Bourtange. Another 16th century star fortress in the Netherlands:

It was built in 1593 by order of William I of Orange to control the only road between Germany and Groningham during the Eighty Years' War.

In 1851, the fortress was dismantled and a peasant settlement grew in its place. Only a few buildings still remember the glory of yesteryear. In the 60s of the 20th century, it was decided to restore the Bourtange fortress. The plan was implemented from 1967 to 1992. The ramparts were raised again, canals were dug, and barracks were rebuilt.

Kastellet, Copenhagen, Denmark:

This structure is in the shape of a pentagonal star, one of the most powerful and fortified in Northern Europe.

The fortress was built on an artificially created island in the shape of a regular five-pointed star (I wonder how? It’s impossible to even imagine the scale of this work). In 1663, a citadel that has survived to this day appeared on the island, in which the headquarters of German troops was located during the Second World War.

Landskrona, Sweden.

Another fortress from the 16th century.

Daugavpils, also known as Dinaburg Fortress, Daugavpils, Latvia.

The construction of this fortress began in 1810 by order of the Sovereign Emperor Alexander I on the eve of the war with Napoleon I in order to strengthen the western border of the Russian Empire.

Alba Iulia, Romania.

Alba Iulia, a fairly large industrial city in the very center of the country. But in this city there is a huge fortress called Alba Carolina, based on various sources, which is the largest fortification in Europe.

Built from 1714 to 1738 by the Italian architect Giovanni Visconti, the fortress served as the general headquarters of the entire Transylvania, but was never attacked by the enemy. The importance of Alba Iulia for the Romanians lies not so much in the military as in the political plane. It was here that on December 1, 1918, the National Assembly of All Romanians of Transylvania declared the whole of Transylvania to be the territory of Romania.

The fortified city of Almeida in Portugal.

The defensive structures of the village, when viewed from above, have the shape of a 12-pointed star according to the number of bastions. The perimeter of the fortress is 2500 meters. This fortress was built in the 17th and 18th centuries around a medieval castle in a strategically important place from the point of view of defense of the region on a plateau 12 kilometers from the Spanish border, established by the 1297 treaty between Portugal and Spain. According to the same treaty, Almeida went to Portugal.

Neuf-Brisach, France

Neuf-Brisach is a city in Alsace with a perfect octagonal configuration, the construction of which began in 1698.

Alessandria, Italy.

Alessandria is a city in the northwestern part of Italy. This city grew out of a fortress founded in 1168 by the Lombard League to protect northern Italian cities from the encroachments of the Holy Roman Empire.

Leopoldov, Slovakia.

Leopoldov was founded in 1665 at the behest of the Austrian Emperor Leopold I.

Pillau fortress, Kaliningrad region, Russia.

Fortification structure from the 17th-18th centuries. Fort located in the city of Baltiysk. Previously, the city was called Pillau (German), so the fortress bears his name. This unique fort was founded in 1601, possibly by the Swedes. By 1670, the Germans had thoroughly rebuilt the fortress in stone.

Subsequently, it was redesigned, completed and improved many times. The fortress was actively used during the Great Patriotic War, and German troops occupied it until April 1945. The fortress was taken, but with very heavy losses. Apparently this structure was well made, conscientiously.

Currently there is a military unit located here.

Pokrovskaya fortress, Omsk region.

These are traces of a fort that was here, but which was razed completely, level with the ground.

Very little can be learned about this unique object from official sources. For example, founded in 1752. It was built in 1752-1755. This guard fortification of the Tobol-Ishim line, located in a village on the northern shore of Lake Pokrovskoye, is a historical monument.

The octagonal fortress occupied an area of ​​6 hectares. The fortification is reinforced by earthworks, a ditch and bastions, which, like arrows, are pushed far forward, providing flanking approaches. The width of the ditches was 13 m, the depth was 2.5 m. On the territory of the fortress there was a gunpowder magazine, a provisions store, officer houses, barracks, a vestibule, a stable, a storage barn, a guardhouse, and a bathhouse.

At the beginning of the 19th century, with the construction of the railway, the fortress lost its military purpose.

And it's all. Who, when and why destroyed this fortress - history is silent. But there are versions from alternative history that are more similar to the truth than all this.

Fortress of St. Anna, Rostov region, Russia.

The fortress was founded by decree of Empress Anna Ioannovna in 1730, construction lasted 3-4 years. Today, only large earthen ramparts and ditches or satellite photographs speak of this former structure.

In general, there are many similar fortresses in Russia, but the only surviving one is the Peter and Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg.

Fort Goryokaku in the city of Hakodeit on the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido.

This is the first and largest fortress in Japan, built in 1866. At the beginning of the 20th century it was transformed into a park, now famous for its magnificent flowering cherry trees. Now, it’s strange and incomprehensible, why was it built only to be torn down 50 years later?

Below are more photos of many of these interesting objects scattered around the world.

In Germany:

In Belgium:

In Italy:

The Netherlands again:

In Great Britain:

Vietnam even has:

But there is absolutely no information anywhere about who built it and when.

In Sri Lanka:

It is believed that the Portuguese built it in 1618.

IN THE USA:

In Canada:

In Mexico:

In Brazil:

New Amsterdam in Suriname (South America):

But this, of course, is not all, but only a small part of these ingenious structures.

Disappeared ancient cities in the shape of stars in the territory of Kyiv and surrounding regions.

The most interesting thing in this article is the fact that the old and new cards turn out to be rotated relative to each other by about 30 degrees. Both maps are oriented towards the pole. Sometimes you can find old maps that have north and south on the contrary, since in the territory of “Tartaria” a different map orientation rule was adopted, when the south was displayed at the top and the north at the bottom, but maps without orientation to the cardinal points are not found. The orientation of the 1648 map gives the position of the north pole in the area of ​​Greenland. Incidentally, the same direction is also oriented. St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg :

If on a modern map of Ukrainian cities the north is at the top (and on the old map too), then it turns out that the geographic pole has shifted. And when overlaying maps, old . This explains why cities are under such a layer of clay. Siberia suffered even more - here its layer is from 10 to 40 m /

Took the card Kyiv Palatinate in Latin for 1648 and superimposed it on a modern map of Ukraine with varying degrees of transparency. Download and compare. On it all the cities are in the shape of stars. They were made of stone, antique. About 50% of these cities no longer exist. The remains of star bastion walls can be searched using this map via google maps. But it is difficult to find, since the stars have been thoroughly erased from the surface of the earth. Many of them are located at the bottom of the Dnieper reservoirs. Don’t forget that all cities have since been covered with 3-4 meters of clay. Also marked on the map are mountains (possibly man-made) that no longer exist. The channels of the Dnieper tributaries do not LOOK like they do now. They are more linear, like the rivers in Western Europe today. Trypillia is an ancient star city just below Kyiv. Some cities are slightly misaligned, there is an error in the old map. I combined the cities of Kyiv and Kremenchug and took into account the channel of the Dnieper.

To understand which star cities we are talking about, read the article first, for those who haven’t read it:

Why modern river beds meander, read:

High resolution map of 1648:

Modern map:

Overlay #1. Transparency 25%:

Overlay #2. Transparency 50%:

Overlay #3. Opaque:

Anyone who wants to practice in Photoshop can superimpose the map of Barklavia Palatinatus from 1639 (Vinnytsia region) and Podolia Palatinatus from the 17th century onto modern maps of these places. All cities on the maps are marked in the form of stars.

Barklavia Palatinatus

Podolia Palatinatus

Ps: to visually imagine how buried the cities are, look at the photo of the excavated house, if I’m not mistaken, in Kazan.

Photo taken from Alexey Kungurov. He has interesting films on YouTube, by the way. For example movie about a nuclear strike in the past.

Does this figure surprise anyone?

Admiring, yes, but not surprising, because we have been familiar with this figure since kindergarten. Nowadays, children themselves cut them out of paper napkins and decorated the group room for the New Year.

But what connection can a natural crystalline structure have with fortifications? It may seem stupid, but I think it can. I'll explain. With all due respect to the merits of our ancestors, I just can’t wrap my head around how, without precise optical and measuring instruments, one can make markings on the ground before starting the construction of such structures? I mean the surveying part of the work. Is it possible to massively set up thousands and thousands of similar structures of varying degrees of complexity all over the world, and at the same time never “mess up”?

Personally, I know of only one fortress that was built sideways, and this is again St. Petersburg, Petropavlovka.

All other “star fortresses” are not just correct, they are PERFECT.

If mine surveyor training had been done by men in bast shoes with ropes and arshin-long sticks, then at least a third of the fortresses would have had flaws and errors. But this is not the case! How?! It can be assumed that we do not know something about the technologies of the past, one can argue that we underestimate the skill, but the most likely assumption today is, I think, my own. And it was born by chance, after I: 1) finished a note about,

2) I watched this video:

3) Then I remembered this:

And only then did it happen.

For a long time, my friends and I discussed the possibility of a hydrodynamic version of the construction of such forts, using controlled water erosion. From the very beginning this idea seemed untenable to me. It would be too sophisticated a method, if at all there is at least one chance of reproducing it.

Then I began to propose an acoustic version, suggesting the possibility of influencing soil masses using sound vibrations. But he himself did not believe in this version. And so... It was necessary for three components to come together in my head:

The influence of sound vibrations on the structure of bulk materials,
- Principles of stratification in the formation of sedimentary rocks,
- The habit of a person to use existing structures for his needs, such as the remains of buildings and structures, and natural formations that are functionally suitable for use for the needs of civil and military construction.

The thing is that the first two factors could have worked out. In detail, this mechanism is not clear to me, but in principle, I consider it quite possible. Just as we now grow artificial crystals, the builders of antediluvian forts could have used outwardly similar technologies.

Let’s say they influenced the bottom sediment of reservoirs with powerful sound vibrations, and the “stars” under their influence formed such regular figures on the bottom. Then, the place was subject to reclamation, or the height of the ramparts reached such a height that it exceeded the water level, and then anything could be built on the earthen structures, as if on a stencil.

But it’s hard to believe that our ancestors owned acoustic generators of such fantastic power. Therefore, I would venture to suggest that all the “stars” were formed... by Mother herself - the raw Earth. It probably itself periodically emits powerful beams of infrasound, the traces of which are these, sometimes cyclopean formations. The Earth probably has enough strength for such a thing. And there is no need to rack your brains about where the hundred thousand million men with stretchers and wooden spades came from, and how many decades it took them to build each “star”.

Out of habit, people used ready-made structures. And often even unconsciously. The ideal structure of streets converging in the center - rays, connected by radial concentric streets, is too reminiscent of snowflakes, and this cannot be an accident.

By chance, this is when it happened twice. Three times is already a pattern. And a thousandfold repetition on all continents is not just a pattern, it is already a LAW, and a concrete-iron one at that. Only Australia is excluded from the pattern, but there is probably a simple explanation for this.

I believe that most medieval star cities were built on a ready-made foundation. And the builders might not even realize how correct and perfect the markings of the streets of their cities were.

The human age is too short to trace in dynamics all the processes that shape the Earth both in the depths and on the surface. And who will guarantee that next Monday the process of forming “fortresses” will not begin there too. True, for this Australia will have to be drowned a little, and I hope this will not happen, but who knows?

As we already know, there are some patterns associated with “ancient” cities. These are several identical signs that cast doubt on what year the city was actually built. These are the signs:

The presence of one or more columns, the top of which is crowned either by the goddess of victory Nike, or by Octavian Augustus with his outstretched right hand. In most cases, Octavian was filmed, and instead of him they put either some hero of the era in which the city was supposedly built, or they didn’t put anything at all. As a rule, the nickname was left, tying the symbol of victory to some event of the era in which the monument was “installed.”

The presence of the Arc de Triomphe in honor of the same Augustus; at the top of the arch, as a rule, the goddess Nike or Octavian was placed in a chariot drawn by four or six horses. The arch should be built in a typical "antique" style, the interior decoration or recesses in the form of squares along the entire internal plane of the arch or octagons. You can see these on the arch in Brussels, in the Mitchell Library in Sydney, Australia at the train station in Washington or in the Baths of Diocletian.

]]> ]]>

The presence of a cathedral, church, temple or other religious building with a dome in the very center of the city, or closer to the center with characteristic architecture. As a rule, they are aimed at the old North Pole - Greenland.

- "Checkerboard" layout of cities according to the type of Greek city policies - straight lines, parallels and perpendiculars.

The presence of a stone obelisk. Sometimes even with Egyptian hieroglyphs

The presence of a pyramid (in very rare cases pyramids have survived to this day, but they still existed).

]]> ]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

The presence of statues of griffins, lions, lions with wings and other animals that were revered in old times.

And of course, the presence of a STAR-SHAPED FORTRESS either around the city or as a separate fortification. All these elements fit together perfectly, and one cannot exist without the other.

The more I look at the fortresses of the star configuration, the more a feeling of unity arises, the feeling that they were all built according to the same project within the framework of a single world state. There are no such fortresses only in Antarctica. There are no such fortresses left in Australia today either, but... I decided to conduct an experiment. Having studied the architecture of the city of Sydney, I came to the conclusion that this is an ancient city, therefore it should have an asterisk. All my attempts to find this fortress or at least a hint of it on Google maps yielded nothing. So I found a city plan from the early 19th century, and what do you think?

]]>
]]>

]]> ]]>

So how? Coincidences?

The question is spinning in my head - from whom to defend within the framework of a single empire? The orientation of the fortresses is so different that you cannot understand which side the enemy was on. For example, on the island of Malta, all the fortresses with the main part of the defensive structures and walls are directed DEEP into the mainland. It’s no different that the separatists from Donbass visited there - they love to fire at themselves. And if you take into account the orientation towards the pole, then it turns out interesting:

]]>
]]>

]]> http://alvantara.livejournal.com/37667.html ]]>

So where was the enemy?
Officially, this whole “star sickness” began with a star-shaped fortress, which, according to legend, was designed by Michelangelo himself. Without geodesy and other sciences that no one needs. But these are ideal geometric figures, equilateral four, five, six and octagons. It was as if someone from above took the surface of the earth like a drawing sheet, made a marking and then built walls along it and poured shafts.

]]>
]]>

And in general, these fortresses are real megalithic structures, for example, the mass of the famous fortress - the star of Bourtange, according to the scientist Alexander Kushelev, whom I respect, is about a million tons. And, as he noted very well, there is not a single image of the area before the construction of the star, there are also no documents or estimates - absolutely NOTHING. And this applies not only to Bourtange, but to all similar fortresses. Many were rebuilt, many adapted into forts, but the basic star configuration was retained.

For example, Fort of the Three Kings in Natal, Brazil. The old gray masonry below and the newer white masonry with loopholes are clearly visible.

]]>
]]>

By the way, about the loopholes. 90 percent of the stars do not have any at all, and 10 percent are clearly rebuilt or add-ons were made on old walls. Loopholes were replaced by embrasures as a more convenient solution with the advent of artillery.

]]>
]]>

You can only shoot in one direction. Someone "hit" the target - you need to shoot quickly before he runs away. Deviate slightly from the given direction - the projectile will hit the embankment and cover you with pieces of earth. The direction of shooting in Naarden is also interesting

]]>
]]>

Did you shoot at the next wall? Or could someone have sailed into the inner channel on a boat or ship, and it had to be destroyed? Again the question is - WHERE IS THE ENEMY?

]]> ]]>

Without any hints)

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

There is no need to talk about protection here at all. Of course, I’m not a military man, and forgive my amateurish thoughts, but in my opinion this is all very impractical. Replace simple high quadrangular walls, which are 3 times cheaper than star walls, with low, but thick, almost without any protection, complex megalithic objects due to the appearance of artillery.

Until the middle of the 16th century, the Italian method of fortification prevailed in the Netherlands, but at that time the War of Independence had just begun, and the old fences of Dutch cities were not able to resist Spanish troops. There was neither money nor time to build new fortresses according to the Italian method, with stone robes and cavaliers, but the resourcefulness of Dutch engineers and local conditions helped the matter.

Economic conditions and lack of time forced the Dutch first of all to abandon stone walls and casemates. The high groundwater level forced the resort to low ramparts (no more than 5.5 m high), but instead to wide water ditches, which ensured safety from an assault. The nature of the struggle (the war for independence was fought with bitterness, not to the death, and, moreover, by armed “civilians”, poorly trained and disciplined), which required tenacity of defense, forced to defend the fortifications step by step to strengthen the bastion arrangement with a number of auxiliary buildings, from of which the first place was occupied by the fossebreya, that is, a lowered shaft in front of the main one, which, together with the main one, delivered a two-tier rifle defense and a cannon defense, from the shaft, along the surface of the glacis and a covered path.

We got out of it again. For example, in Zaporozhye, ditches and ramparts were dug and filled in 10 days. Don't believe me?

Colonel Wilem von Fredesdorf was appointed commandant of the newly built Line.
On August 13, a large convoy with a battalion of soldiers, with a mass of working and family people, with children and all sorts of belongings, moved through Samara to the Moskovka River.

On August 15, the day of the Dormition of the Virgin Mary, Fredesdorf was already on the Moskovka River and, having occupied the Minikhovsky retranjament and several Zaporozhye winter quarters that were here, set up camp.

The construction of the fortress was carried out quickly, so already on August 25, von Fredesdorf in his papers mentioned the Aleksandrovskaya fortress as an existing object. Ditches were dug and the outer contours of the fortification were outlined.

]]>
]]>

The scheme is the same - the prisoners build, in record time, despite economic and other problems, they managed somehow. Where is the engraving report, gentlemen?
Well, how can we not remember the description of such “builders” by foreigners?

"To them, these simple men in torn sheepskin coats, there was no need to resort to various measuring instruments; having inquisitively looked at the plan or model indicated to them, they accurately and gracefully copied them..., despite winter time And 13 - 15 degrees below zero, work continued even at night.

Holding the lantern ring tightly between your teeth, these amazing workers, having climbed to the top of the scaffolding(must have been for coconuts and bananas - Lev the Thin clarification), they diligently did their job. The ability of even ordinary Russians in the technique of fine arts is amazing."

Taken from the blog ]]> Lev Khudoy ]]>
Here is a normal fortress, Khotinskaya. High walls, towers, everything is as it should be, it protects perfectly.

]]>
]]>

And here is the fortress of Bourtange, engraving from the 17th century. Notice the height of the walls and the height of the buildings in the city.

]]>
]]>

The height of the walls is clearly visible

]]>
]]>

Parachute core fffiiiiu broads thousand.

I have always been surprised by the complexity of the design of such fortresses. For example, why build “mergs” that are half the size of the main wall? What is their function? In the top picture you can see two such teeth.

Or here are some old city plans. FOR WHAT?

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

A very good proof that all these stars were built long before Michelangelo and any enlightened European kings is the five-pointed star in the city of Smolensk. Quote

It is noteworthy that the star fortress is crossed by the Smolensk fortress wall, erected (according to official history) under Tsars Fyodor Ioannovich and Boris Godunov in 1595-1602. on the site of an older fortress, built (as it is believed) under the Grand Duke Rostislav Mstislavovich in 1142. Whether the star fortress in Smolensk is the fortress of the Grand Duke or not is a question. But it is a fact that Boris Godunov’s fortress wall stands ON the star fortress, crossing it from north to south and dividing it into two parts - the two eastern rays of the star are inside Godunov’s wall, and the three western rays are outside it. Conclusion - the star fortress was built EARLIER than the fortress of Boris Godunov, i.e. long before 1595, perhaps this is the fortress of Grand Duke Rostislav Mstislavovich from 1142. If so, then such fortresses around the world came from the territory of Ancient Rus', and not from Western Europe, as is commonly believed now. It is possible that it was the Russians who built all these hundreds of fortresses.

]]>
]]>

]]> ]]>

But if these were not fortresses, then what were they? The answer to this question will seem more incredible than we think.

*subconscious* All these stars were huge solar power plants that provided energy and electricity to the entire city. Almost every house in such a city was a conductor of electricity. By means of an electrical impulse (wireless system, such as Bluetooth), all the charge accumulated during the day by the power plant was transferred to the central cathedral, and then distributed throughout the city *subconsciously*

For those who don’t know yet, my method for determining the Truth: ]]> http://mishawalk.blogspot.com/2014/10/blog-post_6.html ]]>

Perhaps we need to start with the fact that humanity has known electricity for a long time, and much better than we imagine.

Electricity in ancient Egypt

Ancient socket

]]>
]]>

Something very similar to a generator

]]>
]]>

Light bulbs

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

Lighting device

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]> ]]>

High voltage pole?

]]> ]]>

Remote Control.

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

The famous battery from Baghdad

]]>
]]>

But what kind of things were done by the “wild” nomads - the Scythians. Scythian pectoral

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

This thing conducts electricity PERFECTLY, you don’t even need any experiments! This is a super conductor, not just a decoration! Moreover, the heads of the Scythians are attached to the hoop with something like soldering, the work is exquisite and amazing. But... it was not the Scythians who did this, as it turns out. This was done... by the Greeks by order of the Scythian nobility. It turns out that nomads may have “knowledge.” Hey, maybe stop talking nonsense already?

Wire from the collection of the State Historical Museum

St. Andrew's Kurgan. 1-2 c. BC. Hryvnia. a gold bracelet

]]>
]]>

Bracelet (such bracelets were worn on the sleeves of clothing). Caucasus, 1st millennium BC

]]> ]]>

Eastern Transcaucasia. I millennium BC Spectacle-shaped pendants.

]]>
]]>

Zarubinets culture (1st century BC - 1st century AD) Pins, brooches.

]]> ]]>

East Slavs. Bracelets in different techniques, including a bracelet braided with “Viking” weaving

]]>
]]>

]]> ]]>

]]>
]]>

]]> ]]>

]]>
]]>

Modern coaxial cables.

In general, there is a person who should be erected a monument for the fact that he was the first to raise the issue of the use of electricity among our ancestors, not only in everyday life, but also in architecture and military affairs. This man's name is Dmitry An, and his blog is a whole universe of useful information and information: ]]> http://dmitrijan.livejournal.com ]]> .

It's hard to believe at first, but the more you dig, the more you discover.

For example, according to Dmitry, the crosses on the domes are antennas or signal transmitters. Now look here

]]>
]]>

Pay attention to the number of antennas. These are not crosses, but antennas. All of Moscow was essentially a huge radio! Moscow speaks and shows!

Another such person - Vladimir Mamzerev.]]> http://pro-vladimir.livejournal.com ]]> .

And the third hero who claims to be immortalized during his lifetime is the already mentioned Alexander Yuryevich Kushelev, the chief curator of the Nanomir laboratory. He was the first to suggest that the stellar configuration is a source of energy, a huge resonator, with the help of which water was evaporated and precious metals were extracted. Here is his model of the Bourtange fortress, built in the HFSS program

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

]]> http://nanoworld.narod.ru/133.htm ]]>
As you can see, the maximum energy is concentrated at the edges of the “teeth”.
Compare

]]>
]]>

]]>
]]>

Fractal antennas ]]>

Knowing that the maximum amount of energy is collected at the tips, the builders installed some kind of fuse. As for the purpose of that thing on the side - the question is open, tell me, who knows)
Absolutely all fortresses were built near water bodies, and if there were none nearby, artificial canals and ditches were dug. And this is not just like that. Water is the best grounding agent for such a huge source of energy. Here is the experience of grounding through a well: ]]> http://www.forumhouse.ru/threads/206587 ]]> . But well 8 of the Kovno fortress in the city of Kaunas, Lithuania

]]>
]]>

We see an iron beam as a grounding conductor and characteristic gentle steps.
But what is hidden behind the masonry.

]]>
]]>

Do you know what this is? This is silicon.
Silicon deposit in Australia

]]>
]]>

And what does silicon have to do with it - you ask.

Silicon-based solar cells (SB) currently account for about 85% of all solar panels produced. Historically, this is due to the fact that in the production of silicon-based SBs, an extensive technological reserve and infrastructure of the microelectronics industry was used, the main “workhorse” of which is also silicon. As a result, many key technologies of the microelectronics industry, such as silicon growing, coating, and doping, have been adapted for the production of silicon batteries with minimal changes and investment. In addition, silicon is one of the most common elements in the earth's crust and, according to various sources, makes up 27-29% by weight. Thus, there are no physical limits to producing a significant fraction of the Earth's electricity with existing Si reserves.

And finally - the antenna on the jumper in Naarden.

]]>
]]>

Well, that seems to be all. The charge was transmitted in waves, without wires, like modern wi-fi or bluetooth. All that remains is to “dig” the embankment and reveal what served as a sensitive photocell and accumulated solar energy. It turns out that you just need to raise your head, and the MAIN source of energy will show its miraculous power on you.
Health and sober mind to everyone)

Mikhail Volk

]]> ]]>

First part:

The first part of this topic aroused the expected discussion and interest among readers. The comments are still coming in. Some of them are very informative. Some of them revealed very interesting facts. I suggest you study them.

Coordinates 48°32"30.8"N 57°39"40.4"E (northeast of the “star” from the first part)

This is either the remnant of a fortress star, or a built fortress wall consisting of one beam

The moat and buildings inside and nearby are clearly visible

Map of “stars” on the territory of Ukraine. Where are all these fortresses? It turns out that some of them can still be found today.

From lena_tai

Either the “star” was conceived this way and built by rays from the river, or the river changed its course and destroyed half of the “star”. If the first, then this fortress (if it is a fortress) can very easily be captured from the side of the river and the fortress has no fortification plan in this sense.

It turns out there are many such examples.

From athanasiykaplya : A few more unrestored forts

Boston. Georges Island. Coordinates: 42.320107° -70.927677° Link
Looks like an unfinished or under-excavated or under-restored fortress

Is there masonry underneath these hills?

The masonry of fairly large blocks is adjacent to the brickwork. The same as in the St. Petersburg forts. Restoration-restoration?

Was there something missing here?

Bunker entrance

Patras (Rio), Greece 38.311257° 21.781466° link

There are only two obvious rays, the rest is somehow all built and rebuilt:

Cannes. Fort Royal, France. 43.523582° 7.044454° Link
There is obvious destruction from the sea, which they tried to smooth out

Quebec 46.807969° -71.207681° link
There are no reliable fortifications on the sea side

From the land side

From the ground the plan is hard to discern

Someone will say that these fortresses and forts were not destroyed at all, but over time they came to this state. Somewhere they dug up, somewhere they reconstructed. Yes, it’s possible, but many objects still have an unfinished look.

alvantara shared a file for the Google Earth program with the locations of the “stars”

One more question. Why in Europe and in other parts of the world these forts are almost perfectly preserved, but on the territory of Russia (they also exist) they are only the remains of ditches and walls, which are just a rampart.

Let’s continue along the “stars” in Russia

Fortress of Kondurcha-Zakamskaya defensive line 1734-1736. Samara Region. Link
54° 18" 5.46" N 51° 19" 55.39" E

An earlier space photo

Is this a mound? Or do you need to dig and there will be stone blocks there?

Link

It is worth saying that between these forts there is a huge wall in its length (now there are just traces of it):

Link
Against whom were such serious fortifications created? Were you preparing for the Pugachev rebellion? So there were several thousand peasants there. That's funny. Or were there, after all, much more serious forces that did not recognize the new rulers of Muscovy, the new St. Petersburg rulers?
Many people know the name of this wall: the Great Trans-Volga Wall

The distance between the “teeth” is 320m

Ditch along the wall

In some places it is stone

There are versions that these shafts are protection from the flood that passed from the Arctic Ocean to the Caspian Sea. Or reducing its subsequent seasonal consequences (spring melting of ice).

In the books of Fomenko and Nosovsky about the events of the “Pugachev uprising” these structures are called the Siberian lines. A photo of an old map is provided, where a number of fortresses and structures are marked. According to their version, it was built by the rulers of Muscovy (Romanov dynasty) to protect against Tartary with its capital in Tobolsk.

Pokrovskaya fortress. Size 350 by 350 meters.

Tambov fortress. Size 350 by 350 meters. 49°8"9.58"N 36°44"31.04"E. 49.135994, 36.741956 (on Google maps)

Boretskaya fortress (Alekseevskaya fortress). Samara region 300 by 300 meters. 49°23"31.93"N 36°15"50.35"E. 49.392203, 36.263986 (on Google maps)

Efimovsky fort. 300 by 300 meters

On the territory of Ukraine:

Oryol fortress. Ukraine, Kharkov region, Novovodolazhsky district
49° 28" 19.91" N 35° 43" 20.91" E 230 by 230 meters

Fortress of St. John. Ukraine, Kharkov region, Krasnogradsky district, 49° 26" 28.83" N 35° 35" 8.69" E, 300 by 300 meters. Fortress of St. John (Ivanovo Fort), belonged to the Ukrainian Line of Defense built in 1731-33, the territory of the Belevsky Infantry Regiment. Link

Fortress of St. Paraskovia. Ukraine Kharkov region, Novovodolazhsky district. 49° 31" 4.27" N 35° 52" 10.21" E, 350 by 350 meters

Fortress of St. Mikhail. 300 by 300 meters