Skeletons of famous people. Facts confirming the existence of a race of giants. Giants of Ancient Rome
20.01.2016 8 959 0 Jadaha
unknown
Probably, there is not a single people in whose myths giants would not be present. They can be good or evil, perform feats and protect other people's treasures, fight each other or stand guard. native land... How can one explain the external similarity of such heroes - despite the fact that the peoples who composed these legends are sometimes not connected in any way? Maybe the legends that people from different parts of the Earth pass from mouth to mouth indicate that the giants really existed?
They differed not only in size
But if there really were giants, not only myths and legends, but also traces of life should have remained after them: architectural structures or buried remains.
According to a number of scientists, many megalithic objects found in different parts of the Earth serve as proof of the existence of giants. Even in our time, it is extremely problematic to build them, and tens or hundreds of thousands of years ago, without lifting mechanisms, it was simply impossible!
In Lebanon, not far from Beirut, is the famous Baalbek Terrace. Three huge stone slabs are embedded in its base, each of which weighs about 800 tons. The plates are identical and fitted to each other so that a knife blade cannot be inserted between them. The researchers calculated that the installation of one such stone block (its dimensions are 21x5x4 meters) would require the simultaneous efforts of at least 35 thousand people!
Who did it and why? Arabic handwritten treatises say that the building was the temple of Jupiter, and it was erected by giant people on the orders of King Nimrod immediately after the Flood.
The ancient city of Teotihuacan, located 50 kilometers from Mexico City, is a whole complex of huge stone blocks. According to the most common historical version, the city was built by giants to turn people into gods. Its layout resembles a model of the solar system. From the central temple, which personifies the Sun, on the corresponding
In the distance are planetary temples, including Pluto, officially opened in 1930! That is, already at that time the ancient inhabitants knew astronomy thoroughly.
The temples were built in the form of pyramids, comparable in size to those of Egypt. It is known that the Aztecs found the city already abandoned, it was they who gave it the name Teotihuacan, which means "divine place".
Among the objects that giants could erect, scientists also include the Egyptian Sphinx, the English Stonehenge, the stone figures of Easter Island, the Tibetan City of the Gods.
Not only the structures themselves are amazing, but also their geometric relationship with each other. For example, a thought line drawn from Tibetan City Gods to the Egyptian sphinx, going further, leads to Easter Island. And the same line drawn from the City of the Gods to Mexican pyramids, also goes to Easter Island! These two lines outline one fourth of the earth's surface, and the line drawn from the City of the Gods to Stonehenge divides such a quarter exactly in half.
Dino hunter?
There are also references to huge people in historical documents. Herodotus writes that the Spartans during military campaigns carried with them the skeleton of the warrior Orestes, who was 3.5 meters tall.
The ancient Greek scientist Pausanias told how a human skeleton 5.5 meters high was found at the bottom of the Sront River.
The Roman historian Josephus Flavius described the testimonies of those who saw the giants live. Eyewitnesses said that their faces were different from ordinary human ones, and their voices were thunderous.
In the era of early Christianity, priests believed that Adam was 4 meters tall, and Eve was 3 meters. There are records of this in the archives of the Vatican.
Manuscripts kept in Tibetan monasteries mention that during earthworks, the monks found the bodies of men and women from 5 to 6 meters tall.
In a book by an unknown medieval author called History and Personality, it is mentioned that a four-meter skeleton in military armor was found in Cumberland (one of the counties of England), next to it were a sword and an ax of the appropriate size.
And, of course, a huge number of finds were made already in our time or close to our time.
In the 20th century, many four-meter skeletons were unearthed in the mountains of the Caucasus.
Their age is tens or even hundreds of thousands of years. The presence of such a large number of remains allowed scientists to assume that it was here, after some kind of global catastrophe, that the giants moved in search of salvation - and here they found their last refuge.
The facts confirming the existence of giants include numerous petrified huge footprints. For example, in Tanzania, an imprint of a human foot 80 centimeters long was discovered. Similar footprints of a slightly smaller size (50 centimeters) were found in the Nevada desert, their age is at least 250 million years.
In Turkmenistan, near the village of Khoja-pil-ata, a chain of five-fingered footprints was found next to the footprints of dinosaurs. The growth of the giant who left them reaches 5 meters, he lived 150 million years ago.
In 1935, a human tooth was found in Hong Kong, which is five times larger than the tooth of an ordinary person, in 1950 in Alaska - a skull 60 centimeters high with two rows of teeth, and in 1999 in Mongolia - a petrified human skeleton about 15 meters long .
Such facts allow us to assert that the giants once really existed. But were they a single people who settled throughout the Earth, or belonged to different races - a question to which scientists have not yet given an unambiguous answer.
Horse under the arm
On the territory of modern Russia, the remains of giants were found in Karelia and other habitats of the Finno-Ugric peoples.
In their legends, two tribes of giants are mentioned at once - the Hiisi and the Adogites. As Finno-Ugric peoples settled in their current territories, the giants moved north. Moreover, this happened not millions of years ago, but already in the Middle Ages. About the giants living in the north as about historical fact wrote the Danish scholar Saxo Grammatik (1140-1206).
Some representatives of the tribes of giants were in contact with ordinary people - and even lived among them. The Arab historian Ibn Fadlan (X century) writes that he came to the Volga Bulgaria (the territory of modern Chuvashia) to look at the giant living here, but, unfortunately, he had already died. Ibn Fadlan describes that he was 12 cubits (about 6 meters) tall and with a head like a huge cauldron.
The testimony of another Arab, the scientist and traveler Abu Hamid al-Andalusi (XI century), has also been preserved. He also visited the places of residence of the Finno-Ugric peoples - and saw a living giant from the Adogites tribe. The scientist said that he could take a horse under his arm the way an ordinary person takes a lamb.
The Russian ethnographer Peter Theodor Schwindt, in his book “Folk Legends of the North-Western Ladoga Region”, published at the end of the 19th century, writes that huge people once lived in these places, who were gradually replaced by the Laplanders. But numerous evidence of the existence of giants remained: huge bones found in the ground, as well as some structures in the mountains and on the islands.
It's all the asteroid's fault
October 24, 2013
five meter skeleton
Children's fairy tales, legends, old books and manuscripts excite our imagination with descriptions of gigantic creatures. Large skeletons from archaeological sites- undeniable evidence of the existence of giants.
People were described by ancient historians. A thousand years ago, the Arab traveler Ibn Fadlan spoke about a five-meter skeleton he saw in the subjects of the Khazar king.
Russian ancient chronicles tell of a four-meter giant - a warrior who stood up to defend the fatherland on the Kulikovo field.
Russian writers Korolenko and Turgenev say that in the museum Swiss cities Lucerne they saw a five-meter skeleton found in 1577 by the doctor Platner in a mountain cave.
Historical chronicles now and then recorded information about the finds of unusual human remains.
Large skeletons 215 cm long were found during construction in 1821 in the USA in Tennessee, in 1885 in Pennsylvania.
In 1971, a farmer in Queensland, plowing a field, found a large fragment of a human jaw with five centimeter teeth.
But it's not the most big skeletons.
In 1899, in Germany, miners found the fossilized remains of giants almost 240 cm tall.
In Australia, the race of giants discovered during the excavations was called Megantropus. Mega - people had the largest skeletons found on the mainland - almost three and a half meters. Suffice it to imagine the 67cm molar found by scientists in 1985! True, the owner of such a jaw lived a very long time ago, almost nine million years ago.
In China, too, there were similar mega-people. Fragments of jaws and teeth confirm the fact that such people should have risen 3-3.5 meters above the ground.
3.6 meters
Cases of finds of imprints of huge feet are not rare. In 1979, a 17 cm toe print was found in the Blue Mountains. If there were a skeleton of the owner of these fingers, then it would be almost six meters long. But not far from Malgoa, three footprints of the giant's steps were found. The human foot was 60 cm long and the step width was 130 cm.
In 1877, gold diggers in Nevada cut a part of the foot with a shin and a patella with picks from the rock. The size is almost a meter from the knee to the foot. That is, the owner of the bones had to have a height of 3.6 meters.
Large human skeletons were found by the German anthropologist Larson Kohl. In Central Africa, on the shores of Lake Elizi, he dug up a mass grave of 12 men from 3.5 to 3.5 meters tall.
There is documentary evidence of the discovery of a human skull in Poland during the Second World War, three times the size of an ordinary skull.
Part of a skull was found in the diamond mines of South Africa in 1950. The diameter of the cranium was 45 cm. It was a very ancient inhabitant of the planet. The age of the find is almost nine million years.
In 2008, near the city of Borjomi, Georgian archaeologists found the skeleton of a three-meter man.
In 2005, burials of people who had rather large skeletons were found in the Sahara, the height of people exceeded the two-meter mark.
120 centimeter human bone
Fossilized 120 centimeter human bone found in Turkey. The owner of such a leg had to be five meters tall.
In the Netherlands in the 17th century there lived a woman nicknamed "The Big Maiden". Her documentary height was 254 cm. In the 19th century, the peasant of the Vitebsk province Fedor Makhnov had a height of 285 cm.
People who had large skeletons existed in modern times. The Dagestan giant of the last century Osman Abdurakhmianov had a height of 207 cm, the Frenchman Rene the Giant was 224 cm, the American Robert Pershing Wadlow had a height of 272 cm, the basketball player Jorge Gonzalez was 231 cm. The Turkish farmer Sultan Kesen was 251 cm tall.
Numerous artifacts prove that in addition to giant people, there were huge animals.
Their large skeletons can be seen in museums around the world. A huge dinosaur skeleton was found at the beginning of the last century in Africa. It was mounted and put on display in the Berlin Museum.
The largest dinosaurs - diplodocus and futalgnocosaurs bypassed in size modern giant blue whale. His life-size skeleton can be seen in the Museum natural history in Santa Barbara (USA).
Representatives of the fauna also have large skeletons, which, for various reasons, have "outgrown" their relatives: a giant horse from Belgium named Radar; the huge Big Cow Chilly; a very large rabbit named Emmy, 1.5 cm long; a giant pig from China with a waist circumference of 2.3 cm and fourteen centimeter tusks.
The incredible largest skeletons of birds, animals, prehistoric dinosaurs, footprints of people - giants in the world's museums - an indisputable fact that legends about giants were formed from real facts, and not from fiction.
The ability of people to believe in miracles has long been a reliable source of income for all sorts of scammers. This time the forger was not chasing a long dollar - he worked for the love of art ...
In this article, I would like to analyze in detail a fairly large-scale falsification of the last decade. Its essence is that archaeologists allegedly find the remains of giant people all over the Earth, up to 2, 3, 4 and even 10 meters tall. It has become a tidbit for lovers of various kinds of sensation, conspiracy theories. A lot of sites, from those who just love sensations of any kind (very "yellow" sites), and ending with creationist sites, actively publish more and more photos of the "remains" found, "revealing the theory of evolution official science"showing these very" photographs "of the giants. Immediately, lovers of everything mystical and mysterious began to put forward versions that it was who built the pyramids, placed the stones of Stonehenge - in a word, created all the ancient Wonders of the World, which supposedly are beyond the power of an ordinary person.
There is nothing surprising in the fact that in our time people believe, to put it mildly, unreliable rumors. I want secrets, I want mysteries, even where there are none. It is not surprising that there are lovers of sensations, but how many there are. By typing the query "giant skeleton" in Google, we will see a sea of \u200b\u200bsites where photos of the "remains" are laid out; hundreds of people in the comments enthusiastically write: “now I believe!” and curse modern science for hiding the truth.
Gunpowder in the fire is added by the fact that in some religions and myths of antiquity giants and giants are mentioned. “So here it is, the lost link!” - exclaim gullible people. Meanwhile, using false facts to prove any, even the most correct hypothesis, can only spoil both your reputation and the credibility of the hypothesis.
Let's take a look at what these amazing "photos" are and where they came from. Let's start with the first and most famous of them.
Return to the Valley of the Giants is a photographic montage depicting an archaeological site of a giant humanoid skeleton that won third place in the 2002 Archaeological Anomalies 2 graphic design competition at www.worth1000. com. . Shortly after the publication, the photo was widely circulated on the Internet and, with accompanying articles, was published by some means. mass media as proof of the existence of an ancient race of giants, references to which are contained in the Bible and the myths of many peoples. After the misunderstanding was discovered, the author of the photomontage, known by the pseudonym IronKite, gained some notoriety in the graphic design and anomalous research communities.
Story
In 2004 on the Internet and some printed publications A photograph has been circulated from an archaeological site of a giant humanoid skeleton. Based on the size of the figures of archaeologists, available in the same picture, the length of the skeleton was estimated at 18-24 meters. Early Internet reports claimed that the find was made in the desert in western India by a National Geographic expedition. According to the source, the excavation area has been cordoned off by the Indian army, and all details are classified. The report also spoke of the discovery of stone tablets with ancient Sanskrit inscriptions, according to which the skeletons belonged to the mythical giants Rakshasas, who defied the gods and were destroyed by them.
Another version of this story was published on April 24, 2004 in the Bangladeshi newspaper The New Nation. According to this newspaper, the find was made in the desert in southeastern Saudi Arabia by a Saudi Aramco search team searching for natural gas deposits. It was also claimed that tablets with inscriptions in Arabic were found in the burial, according to which the remains belonged to representatives ancient tribe Aad, the descendants of the Old Testament prophet Noah mentioned in the Bible and the Koran. The tribe defied the plans of Allah and was destroyed by him. The site of the find was cordoned off by Saudi troops, the picture was taken from a military helicopter.
Similar articles were published in the March 2007 issue of the Indian magazine Hindu Voice, published in Mumbai, and later in several other print media.
Elementary photo examination made by the study center paranormal activity Rationalist International found that there are no independent sources of information about the find, and the image itself bears traces of software processing using a graphics editor. The most obvious sign of a fake was the different direction and intensity of the shadows cast by the giant skeleton and its surroundings. A more detailed study showed that the photo is a montage of fragments of several images. Apparently, this was a snapshot of real archaeological excavations, in central part which contains an enlarged image of a human skeleton.
Later, the source of the photomontage was established.
Society spokesman James Owen conducted an investigation. And I found, pardon the pun, "where the legs grow from" this skeleton.
As the investigation showed, the photo of the giant came from the well-known site worth1000.com, where a competition for graphic design masters called "Archaeological Anomalies" was held. The aim of the contest participants was to create images illustrating fictitious archaeological finds. The site publishes works of various kinds, ranging from frankly humorous to high-quality imitations of photographs of archaeological excavations. The author of the work, a Canadian illustrator known by the pseudonym IronKite (Russian iron kite), told the editors of National Geographic magazine in an email that he did not aim to mislead anyone. However, the image fell on fertile ground - many do not doubt that giants once lived on Earth.
Here is a direct link to the work itself with Giants by IronKite at worth1000.com
Soon one of the original photographs was discovered, which served as material for editing. It was taken on September 16, 2000 in Hyde Park, New York, where a Cornell University paleontological team led by Professor John Chiment excavated the remains of a 14 to 11-year-old mastodon. thousand years.
The National Geographic Society, founded in 1888 in the United States, is one of the oldest in the world. Since that time, it has published the famous National Geographic magazine. And now, keeping up with the era, he also publishes daily news on the Internet on his National Geographic News portal.
Society is the most authoritative organization. She is trusted. This is full of people who consider authentic photos. giant skeleton that have been circulating on the Internet for several years now. Excite the imagination and make you believe in the conspiracies of scientists against civilization. After all, the discovery of a gigantic skeleton is "hung" specifically on the geographical society. Allegedly, its specialists participated in the excavations.
Any sane person can easily guess that the photos are fake, says National Geographic News illustration editor Sebastian John (photo editor Sebastian John). “However, we regularly receive hundreds of inquiries by email from all over the world. Like, tell me, what kind of skeleton is this? True, what did you find? Where is he now? Is it hidden from prying eyes?
National Geographic could not stand it, and in 2007 published rebuttals to these photos - but things are still there. More and more “remains” are being created, and I won’t be surprised if they say to me - “well, look, there are so many photographs! It can't be all fake!" Alas, but all this is really the fruit of the creativity of people who masterfully (and sometimes very badly) own Photoshop. And the beginning of this story surprisingly coincides in time with the publication of creativity on worth1000.com. A lot of photos are easily explained by a lot of "workers" looking for "remains" in the Photoshop environment.
The trailblazer IronKite seems to be followed by followers. And now the Internet is full of giant skeletons.
These classic "photos of giants" are currently literally circulating from the bottom of the yellow site to the next, through email, blogs and forums to excite the imagination of the ignorant layman.
Many do not doubt the authenticity of the images. In fact, the "giant skeleton" is not a photograph of a real discovery. However, observations show that the high quality of the fake images, combined with the vaguely plausible explanations that accompany them, are apparently sufficient to convince many recipients that the "discoveries" are genuine.
By the way, the work of IronKite was even shown on YouTube. The video creator uses the giant IronKite skeleton, along with other questionable images, as "proof" that giants once lived on Earth. The well-documented deception with the images, in addition to the number of logical flaws, has caused the series to sack from YouTube users.
Even if you believe that a race of giants existed on Earth, you can be sure that these photographs do not reflect some of their remains. They take their original origins from the Worth1000 competition, and the image's status as a purely fictional "archaeological discovery" is understandable.
Not only do objects cast shadows in different directions, but the skeleton does not fit into the panorama of the image at all due to the difference in angles. The skeleton lacks perspective, most likely due to the fact that the source was a photograph of an ordinary skeleton, taken vertically, while the landscape in which it was placed was taken at an angle with perspective.
Giant Atlantean Skeleton Found in the Ocean Again!
1. The color border on the left side of the picture immediately catches your eye. The skeleton is simply glued onto the background with coral reef.
2. The lower right part of the school of fish is translucent - this indicates a low professional level of Photoshop. Instead of carefully cutting out the fish on a new layer, he applied feathering and reduced the transparency of the layer.
3. And as always, symmetry breaking. The size of the skull is disproportionate to the size of the femurs. Apparently, to emphasize the size of the skeleton, the skull was enlarged.
A seasoned photoshopper who knows his business worked here. He burned out on ignorance of the anatomy of the human body. The size of the vertebrae is too huge for this size of the skull.
The edges of the pasted black-and-white image of the skeleton into the pit are clearly visible. In addition, the quality of the source with skeletons is much worse than the main image, this is especially noticeable when zoomed in.
Verdict: Nice work in Photoshop.
Allegedly, various finds of giant skulls, which in themselves are very mediocre fakes, when comparing images, provide more information.
It is the same regular size skull, if we take both skulls and compare them as shown in the picture, we will see that they are identical. Even if we imagine for a second that these are the same excavations, then why did the skull change its size by 3 times? .
On the left in the photograph, the skull is larger than the seated person, and given that the person is closer to us than the skull, then in reality the skull would be even larger.
On the right, we also see a skull, but this time it is decently smaller than a seated person, while the skull is in the foreground, if placed next to a person, it will be 2 times smaller.
In the left picture, the skull literally sank into the plane of the earth, the frame hanging in the air smiles no less. Besides, where has it been seen that unique finds are literally trampled underfoot?
Verdict: not the best fakes of a giant, using an ordinary skull.
Considering the various options for fake giants, I became curious if I could replicate something similar using only the most basic skills in the Adobe Photoshop graphics program. I decided to create some similar images.
As you can see, creating something like this is not difficult.
Note: Walking on the Internet "photos of giants" highlights their individuality. You won't find a "giant skeleton photo" taken several times from different angles. Single images everywhere. It is hard to believe that such a unique find was taken only once from one position. This once again confirms the individuality of the work on the production of "photographs of giants". The creators of the site Worth1000.com simply did not have the goal of misleading the public, so each of them limited himself to a single work, it is not surprising that the network does not have diverse images of at least one giant, "filmed" from different angles. In addition, creating such an image is much more difficult.
Another fact is not in favor of the giants. Giant human bones are not exhibited in any museum in the world. But enthusiasts, led by historian Michael Baigent, author of the acclaimed book Forbidden Archeology, blame traditional science for this. Like, unique finds were specially hidden. More from sin. Because otherwise we would have to change our views on evolution, and on the entire history of mankind.
All the absurdity of this "argument" can be realized after reading the article
Pseudoscience as it is
Often, from parascientific works, one can learn about some “forbidden” discoveries that threaten established ideas and are therefore hidden from the public.
Without exception, all such messages are fiction. A researcher who stumbles upon something truly remarkable will seek to report the find in order to immortalize his name through the ages. If, for some reason, he delays publication, envious colleagues will certainly not miss the opportunity to attribute the discovery to themselves. Even if the government interferes, for some reason wanting to hide the truth, then unfriendly states, having found out the secret with the help of their special services, will immediately stop this attempt.
And yet there is something gigantic in museums - teeth. In appearance - almost human, but 6 times larger than ours. First discovered in 1935 by the Dutch paleontologist Koenigswald in ... one of the pharmacies in Hong Kong. According to estimates, their owners would have to weigh 350-400 kilograms.
Many "giants" still "trump" these teeth, attributing them to mythical giants - the predecessors of people. However, it is known that in 1956 in South China, in the province of Guangxi, archaeologists dug up three huge jaws at once with exactly the same teeth. And they determined that they belonged to anthropoid apes - the so-called Gigantopithecus. Yes, these primates were huge - almost four meters. Kind of like mini King Kongs. But not by people.
And what about myths?
Giant enthusiasts continue to trumpet about the former existence of giants, they first of all refer to countless myths. Naturally, it is difficult to find a people who would not add up legends about giants - one listing of their national names would take up a whole book page.
What are myths? Here are the lines from the Bible: "At that time there were giants on earth, especially since the time when the sons of God began to enter into the daughters of men, and they began to give birth ..."
Elsewhere in the Bible there is a "report" of the scouts sent by Moses to Palestine: "... There we saw giants ... from a gigantic family; and we were ... before them, like locusts ...".
Another argument is the strange cyclopean buildings. And the most amazing of them is the Baalbek Terrace in Lebanon, located about a hundred kilometers from Beirut. At its base, archaeologists discovered monolithic stone blocks measuring 21 by 5 by 4 meters. Some weigh 800 tons. And they are fitted so neatly that it is difficult to stick even a needle between the edges. Who, if not the giant tilers, could lay them down?
However, according to skeptics, Baalbek is not the best argument in favor of the existence of giants, says anthropologist Andrei Grinevsky. - Yes, no one can yet explain how the 800-ton stone blocks were laid. But to assume that they were dragged by 20-meter giants is naive. With such growth, you can grab a monolith with a maximum of six. In total, more than 100 tons "per brother". Do not lift.
There are imprints of huge feet, - The most famous of them is located in South Africa. It was found by local farmer Stoffel Coetzi at the beginning of the last century. A “left footprint” is imprinted into an almost vertical wall to a depth of about 12 centimeters. Its length is 1m 28 centimeters. They assure: "inherited" a man about 10 meters tall. Stepped here hundreds of millions of years ago, when the rock was soft. Then it froze, turned into granite and stood upright due to geological processes.
In my opinion, the footprint only looks like a human one. But there are no clear signs. It could also be left by a stone that later fell out. And a dinosaur.
What if giants really lived on Earth?
Excavations show that there was a time when giants lived on Earth. And not lizards, but mammals. Some died out died out a long time ago - at the last glacial period. Others - much later - about a thousand years BC. And people could see them
giant short-faced bear,
living in Alaska and Chukotka, reached almost 5 meters if it stood on its hind legs. By the way, I ran on them at a speed of almost 70 kilometers per hour.
No less than a fast bear was a 5-ton giant sloth.
And up to the size of the current hippopotamus, beavers and rats waved. In a word, gigantism is not alien to nature. So why should humans be the exception?
The answer lies in the very structure and proportions of the human body. If you look at the typical representatives of giants (dinosaurs, elephants and others), then they all have in common: the horizontal arrangement of the spine, a relatively small head, the center of mass is concentrated in the lower part of the body.
The legs of a typical mammal support the mass of its body, and as the mass of the animal increases, the strength of the support should increase accordingly. Suppose that all the linear dimensions of the animal have doubled. The mass of such an enlarged animal will then increase by a factor of 8, i.e., as a cube of linear dimensions, which should affect the strength of the supporting structures. In order for these structures not to collapse, their cross-section must increase in proportion to the eightfold increase in the load, but if all dimensions are simply doubled, the cross-sectional area of the bones will only increase by 4 times. This is clearly not enough, and in order to support eight times the increased weight, the bones must increase disproportionately.
A three-fold increase in linear dimensions gives a 27-fold increase in mass, and the cross-sectional area of \u200b\u200bthe bone should be increased by a factor of 27.
Measurement of the ultimate bone strength of mammals of different weights from 0.05 to 700 kg (14,000-fold difference) did not reveal any significant differences (233±53 MN/m2 in small animals and 200±28 in large animals) (Biewener, 1982) .
Moreover, the mass of the skeleton of a mammal does not fit into the schemes that take into account only gravitational loads. During movement, there are always forces due to acceleration or deceleration, which twist and bend the skeleton, and its elements must withstand these forces and not break, first of all under the influence of bends.
Those. if a person has linear dimensions of 20 meters (i.e., more than 10 times the norm), then his volume (and mass) increases by 1000 (10 cubed) times, i.e. it weighs about 80 tons (80,000 kg). And this is not compatible with life, because it will simply be crushed (even in the supine position, the chest will collapse) with our gravity.
Thus ... Yes, there may be giants, but they will not look like people, and their skeletons will not look like human ones. Let's take another simple example. If a person with a height of 180 cm and a weight of 80 kg is quadrupled to 720 cm, then his weight will be 5120 kg, and the bones with such dimensions in human proportions will be optimally adapted only for 1280 kg, that is, the additional mass above the optimal will be 3840 kg (i.e. area the cross section of the bones will increase by 16 times, but the body weight will increase by 64 times), the bones simply cannot withstand such an overload, this is equivalent to the fact that a person 180 cm tall and weighing 80 kg, with the same muscles and bones, will hang a load of 240 kg for life, and what will happen to his joints and spine? I'm talking about what giant size the cross section of the bones must proportionally be much larger, depending on the magnification factor. Therefore, if there were human giants, then their skeletons will look completely different from the photoshop photos from photoshop sites. That's all. Well, the skeletons of giants were indeed found - these are dinosaurs, which, with such dimensions, had powerful bones and could not do without a tail, and their center of gravity is completely different, as well as the principle of building a skeleton for such a mass.
What do giants suffer from?
In ancient times, myths and legends associated high growth with some kind of superpowers, and "giants" have always enjoyed great respect. However, according to doctors, high growth can result in poor health - and this is especially true for women. Recently, at the age of only 53, the tallest woman in the world, Sandy Allen, died - and, alas, she suffered from many chronic diseases.
The height of American Sandy Allen was 2 meters 32 centimeters - that is, three centimeters higher than that of the famous Chinese basketball player Yao Ming.
She was only slightly inferior to other tallest people in the world - Ukrainian Leonid Stadnik (2 meters 53 centimeters) and Tunisian Radhuan Charbib (2 meters 36 centimeters). The cause of Allen's death is still unknown, but in the hospital in which she was, she was given numerous dangerous diagnoses.
Among them are diabetes, a tendency to infections and kidney failure. In addition, it was difficult for her to walk, so she spent the last years of her life in a wheelchair.
A person is destroyed by gravity - after all, his muscles and bones are simply not adapted for such growth. In such people, the proportions of the skull are disturbed, the feet and hands grow to enormous sizes, the tongue becomes huge - and because of this, giants very often suffer from shortness of breath.
Conclusion
Today, on the Internet, it is not difficult to find sites full of bright headlines about the discovery of the millennium, about a hidden sensation. Demand creates supply. People believe, to put it mildly, unreliable rumors that excite the imagination. I want secrets, I want mysteries, even where there are none. It is not surprising that there are lovers of sensations, but how many there are.
However, if you carefully approach the issue of giants under consideration, analyze information and elementary logical calculations, an unambiguous conclusion suggests itself that, for certain reasons, the existence of people of gigantic stature is simply impossible, it is not surprising that there is no real evidence of the former existence of giants. Some myths, dubious evidence and fraud.
What a find!
Why scientists hide this information in every possible way, it became known only now. We must immediately make a reservation that scientists hide this information by hook or by crook, since it does not fit at all into the foundations of the world that history textbooks have been describing to us since childhood.
For a long time, burial places have been found on the planet, and more often - the remains of dead giant people. They are dug all over the world, both on land and under water in the seas and oceans. Another confirmation of this is a find in Yakutia. A group of independent researchers have been dealing with this issue for many years and have formed a true picture of what really happened on our planet 12-20,000 years ago. But it's not that long ago!
The growth of giants during their lifetime ranged from 4 to 12 meters, in addition to great physical strength, they had phenomenal mental abilities. Isn't this the mysterious civilization of Atlantis, which some consider mythical, while others really existed and died.
So, the researchers claim that it was this civilization of giants that built the pyramids not only in Egypt, but throughout the planet, the total number of pyramids they built is more than 600. Moreover, the construction was carried out in a strictly specified geometry.
The pyramids were erected without the use of any slave force with the help of a simple technology that is used now, this is an ordinary formwork, that is, the blocks were not moved a long distance, but poured into wooden molds with a strong concrete composition! And their purpose was energy and associated with cosmic energy, the use of which is still unknown to us.
It was only later that a different civilization of people, in particular, the Egyptians began to worship the supreme gods, who built the pyramids and made tombs for the pharaohs out of them, this is already a religion and separate topic. As you understand, the Egyptians themselves did not build pyramids!
The most interesting question is why such giants could exist and why did they die!?
The fact is that scientists express the version of the four moons, and the gravity on the planet was completely different and the atmospheric pressure was different, under such physical conditions, giant people could feel great and live unreasonably long. And death is caused by a catastrophe, the fall of three moons on the surface of the earth.
But researchers refute this theory, since imagine what will happen if at least now our moon approaches our planet, this is not the end of the world, but simply its death. So there is an opinion that in fact the gravity on the planet was different, and around the earth there was a belt of ice asteroids, like rings around Saturn.
Therefore, the planet was extremely enriched with oxygen, which gave a strong impetus to the development of not only giant people, but also the animal world. But as a result of the change of the poles and other cosmic changes, the ice belt collapsed on the earth with a squall of water, which led to the death of this civilization, and, accordingly, climatic changes took place already close in physics to ours today.
Watch the video!
There is irrefutable evidence that giant people lived on Earth. archaeological finds different years found all over the world confirm this fact.
Historical chronicles of the 19th century often report finds in different parts of the world of skeletons of people of abnormally tall stature.
In 1821, in the United States in Tennessee, the ruins of an ancient stone wall were found, and under it were two human skeletons 215 centimeters tall. In Wisconsin, during the construction of a granary in 1879, huge vertebrae and skull bones were found "of incredible thickness and size," according to a newspaper article.
In 1883, several burial mounds were discovered in Utah, in which there were burials of people of very tall stature - 195 centimeters, which is at least 30 centimeters above the average height of the Aboriginal Indians. The latter did not make these burials and could not provide any information about them. In 1885, in Gusterville (Pennsylvania), a stone crypt was discovered in a large grave mound, in which there was a skeleton 215 centimeters high. Primitive images of people, birds and animals were carved on the walls of the crypt. 
In 1890, in Egypt, archaeologists found a stone sarcophagus with a clay coffin inside, which contained the mummies of a two-meter red-haired woman and a baby. The features of the face and the addition of the mummies differed sharply from the ancient Egyptians. Similar mummies of a man and a woman with red hair were discovered in 1912 in Lovelok (Nevada) in a cave carved into the rock. The growth of a mummified woman during her lifetime was two meters, and men - about three meters.
Australian finds
In 1930, near Basharst, Australia, jasper miners often found fossilized imprints of huge human feet. The race of giant people, whose remains were found in Australia, anthropologists called meganthropus. The growth of these people ranged from 210 to 365 centimeters. Megantropuses are similar to Gigantopithecus, the remains of which were found in China. Judging by the found fragments of jaws and many teeth, the growth of Chinese giants was 3 to 3.5 meters, and the weight was 400 kilograms Near Basarst, in river sediments, there were stone artifacts of enormous weight and size - clubs , plows, chisels, knives and axes. Modern Homo sapiens would hardly be able to work with tools weighing from 4 to 9 kilograms.
An anthropological expedition, which specifically investigated the area in 1985 for the presence of the remains of meganthropus, excavated at a depth of up to three meters from the surface of the earth. Australian researchers found, among other things, a petrified molar 67 mm high and 42 mm wide. The owner of the tooth had to be at least 7.5 meters tall and weigh 370 kilograms! Hydrocarbon analysis determined the age of the finds, amounting to nine million years. 
In 1971, in Queensland, farmer Stephen Walker, while plowing his field, came across a large fragment of a jaw with teeth five centimeters high. In 1979 in Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains locals found a huge stone sticking out above the surface of the stream, on which one could see the imprint of a part of a huge foot with five fingers. The transverse size of the fingers was 17 centimeters. If the print had been preserved in its entirety, it would have been 60 cm long. It follows that the imprint was left by a man of six meters in height. Near Malgoa, three huge footprints 60 centimeters long, 17 wide were found. The giant's step length was measured 130 centimeters. Traces were preserved in the petrified lava for millions of years, even before Homo sapiens appeared on the Australian continent (if the theory of evolution is considered correct). Huge footprints are also found in the limestone bed of the Upper Maclay River. The fingerprints of these footprints are 10 cm long and the width of the foot is 25 cm. Obviously, the Australian Aborigines were not the first inhabitants of the continent. It is interesting that in their folklore there are legends about giant people who once lived in these territories.
Other evidence of giants
In one of the old books entitled "History and Antiquity", now kept in the library of Oxford University, there is an account of the discovery of a giant skeleton made in the Middle Ages in Cumberland. “The giant is buried to a depth of four yards and is in full military dress. His sword and battle ax rest next to him. The length of the skeleton is 4.5 yards (4 meters), and the teeth of the "big man" measure 6.5 inches (17 centimeters)"
In 1877, near Eureka, Nevada, prospectors were working for gold panning in a deserted, hilly region. One of the workers accidentally noticed something sticking out above the ledge of the cliff. People climbed a rock and were surprised to find the human bones of the foot and lower leg, along with the patella. The bone was immured in the rock, and the prospectors freed it from the rock with picks. Assessing the unusualness of the find, the workers delivered it to Evreka. The stone, in which the rest of the leg was embedded, was quartzite, and the bones themselves turned black, which betrayed their considerable age. The leg was broken above the knee and consisted of a knee joint and intact bones of the lower leg and foot. Several doctors examined the bones and came to the conclusion that the leg undoubtedly belonged to a person. But the most intriguing aspect of the find was the size of the leg - 97 centimeters from the knee to the foot. The owner of this limb during his lifetime had a height of 3 meters 60 centimeters.
Even more mysterious was the age of the quartzite in which the fossil was found - 185 million years, the era of dinosaurs. Local newspapers vied with each other to report the sensation. One of the museums sent researchers to the place of discovery in the hope of finding the rest of the skeleton. But, unfortunately, nothing more was found.
In 1936, the German paleontologist and anthropologist Larson Kohl found the skeletons of giant people on the shores of Lake Elisey in Central Africa. 12 men buried in a mass grave had a height of 350 to 375 centimeters during their lifetime. Curiously, their skulls had sloping chins and two rows of upper and lower teeth.
There is evidence that during the Second World War in Poland, during the burial of the executed, a fossilized skull 55 centimeters high was found, that is, almost three times more than that of a modern adult. The giant to whom the skull belonged had very proportional features and was at least 3.5 meters tall.
giant skulls
Ivan T. Sanderson, a well-known zoologist and frequent guest on the popular American show Tonight in the 60s, once shared with the public a curious story about a letter he received from a certain Alan McShir. The author of the letter in 1950 worked as a bulldozer operator on the construction of a road in Alaska. He reported that the workers found two huge fossilized skulls, vertebrae and leg bones in one of the grave mounds. The skulls were 58 cm high and 30 cm wide. The ancient giants had a double row of teeth and disproportionately flat heads. Each skull had a neat round hole in the upper part. North America. The vertebrae, as well as the skulls, were three times larger than those of modern humans. The length of the leg bones ranged from 150 to 180 centimeters. 
In South Africa, in diamond mining in 1950, a fragment of a huge skull 45 centimeters high was discovered. Above the superciliary arches were two strange protrusions resembling small horns. Anthropologists, in whose hands the find fell, determined the age of the skull - about nine million years.
There is reliable evidence of the finds of huge skulls in South-East Asia and on the islands of Oceania.
At the beginning of the 16th century, one discovery made the whole French kingdom talk about itself: a complete skeleton of a man of gigantic stature was found, who lived in a very specific era. It was the king of the Cimbri, one of the two tribes attacking Gaul, who was defeated by the Roman general Marius. Nicolas Habicot published in 1613 "A Dissertation on the Skeleton of the Giant Teutobochus, King of the Cimbri". This skeleton really made a strong impression, because it belonged to a man 25 feet tall. The discovery, which was considered genuine, was only talked about for a long time, and the alleged skeleton of "Teutoboch" for several generations occupied its rightful place in the Museum of Natural History. This was also believed in the 19th century, but Cuvier, approaching his research more carefully, discovered a cunning hoax. The famous skeleton, submitted in September 1842 for consideration to the Academy of Sciences, turned out to be made up of real fossil bones, but these were not human bones at all: they were the bones of ... a mastodon, that is, a species of prehistoric giant elephant that disappeared even before the appearance of mammoths. This means that the dexterous "needleworker" simply figured out how to give the bones a "standing" position, so that the growth and posture of the skeleton resembled the backbone of a person. 
It is also usually noted that the presence of giant monuments does not at all speak in favor of the actual existence of giants. Pyramids and megaliths are certainly impressive, but there is no reason to believe that their creators were of gigantic stature. In the end, Cathedral in Strasbourg - also a huge building, but nevertheless it was built by people of quite normal size, they just possessed perfect technology.
And yet there are some very intriguing archaeological discoveries. Archaeologist Burkhalter during excavations in Moravia discovered a stone tool, the dimensions of which exceeded three by four meters, and the weight was equal to three or four pounds! It was quite obviously a used tool, and not at all a symbolic piece of household utensils; it is clear that the presence of a votive ax would no more prove the existence of giants than a discovery in an ancient temple huge statues. But there is much better evidence: a whole city was found in Tiaguanaco, built for people whose normal height was gigantic - three or four meters.
Let us give the floor to our friend Marcel Moreau: “Humanity keeps in its atavistic memory the memories of these giants of the highest intelligence, descended from the gods, giants who guided and taught people. Humanity remembers paradise, lost from the very beginning, about the initial high initiation, followed by the fall.
In contact with
